Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

[The lungs and immunosuppressants: Practical problems].

With a growing number of patients receiving immunosuppressive drugs, lung specialists are faced with new problems.

This review addresses:

  1. specific interactions between some pre-existing respiratory diseases (asthma, bronchiectasis, infiltrative lung disease, repeated pneumonia, etc) and immunosuppressants;
  2. some particular issues in the care of respiratory complications (infections, thoracic surgery, neoplasia, thromboembolism, etc) in patients undergoing immunosuppressive treatment.

Febrile respiratory illnesses in infancy & atopy are risk factors for persistent asthma & wheeze.

Severe viral respiratory illnesses and atopy are risk factors for childhood wheezing and asthma.To explore associations between severe respiratory infections and atopy in early childhood with wheeze and asthma persisting into later childhood.

147 children at high atopic risk were followed from birth to 10years. Data on all respiratory infections occurring in infancy were collected prospectively and viral etiology ascertained. Atopy was measured by skin prick tests at 6months, 2 and 5years. History of wheeze and doctor-diagnosed eczema and asthma was collected regularly until 10years of age.At 10years 60% of the cohort was atopic, 25.9% had current eczema, 18.4% current asthma and 20.4% persistent wheeze. 35.8% experienced ≥one lower respiratory infection (LRI) associated with fever and/or wheeze in year1. Children who had wheezy, or in particular, febrile LRI in infancy and were atopic by 2years, were significantly more likely to have persistent wheeze (RR3.51; 95%CI 1.83-6.70; p<0.001) and current asthma (RR4.92; 95%CI 2.59-9.36; p<0.001) at 10years.

Severe viral respiratory infections in infancy and early atopy are risk factors for persistent wheeze and asthma. The strongest marker of the asthmatogenic potential of early life infections was concurrent fever.

The occurrence of fever during respiratory illnesses is an important marker of risk for wheeze and asthma later in childhood, suggesting it should be measured in prospective studies of asthma aetiology.

Corticosteroids in Respiratory Diseases in Children.

We review recent advances in the use of corticosteroids in pediatric lung disease. They are frequently used, either systemically or by inhalation. Their mechanisms of action in pulmonary diseases are ill defined. Corticosteroids exert direct inhibitory effects on many inflammatory cells through genomic mechanisms. There is a time lag before clinical response, and the wash out of effects is also prolonged. Prompt relief in some conditions such as croup may be related to airway mucosal vasoconstriction through a nongenomic mechanism.

Corticosteroids have proven beneficial roles in asthma, croup, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and subglottic hemangioma. In some conditions, such as bronchiolitis, cystic fibrosis and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, their use is controversial and is not recommended routinely. In other conditions, such as tuberculosis, interstitial lung disease, acute lung aspiration and acute respiratory distress syndrome, corticosteroids are often used empirically despite any clear evidence. New drug regimens including the more flexible use of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β-agonists in asthma, the lack of efficacy of oral corticosteroids in preschool children with acute wheeze, the severe complications of systemic dexamethasone used to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia and thus more restricted use, and the beneficial effect of pulse high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis or cystic fibrosis are among the major recent developments.

There is concern about adverse effects, especially growth and adrenal suppression, induced by systemic corticosteroids in children. These have been reduced, but not eliminated with the use of the inhaled route.

The benefits must be weighed against the potential detrimental effects.

Compliance with guidelines in the treatment of asthma exacerbations in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the approach to asthma exacerbations in a primary care centre in comparison with current guidelines and to ascertain the resolution of the episodes.

METHODS: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was performed in asthmatic patients over 14 years old who were consulting for asthma exacerbations in a primary care centre during a 6-month period. The treatment given and the resolution obtained were evaluated.

RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three asthma exacerbations were registered, corresponding to 96 patients. A total of 74% were mild exacerbations, 24.4% moderate and 1.6% severe. The severity of asthma correlated directly with the severity of exacerbations. The frequency of resolution was 98.4%, with an average duration of medical attention of 30 min (SD 16.5). According to guidelines, 60.2% of the mild exacerbations were well treated, as were 26.7% of the moderate exacerbations and none of the severe episodes. Peak expiratory flow was measured in 54.5% of patients. In 82 cases (66.6%) salbutamol was given with a large-volume spacer chamber. Treatment after discharge was correct in 27.3% of the mild and 23.3% of the moderate exacerbations. A total of 23 (23.9%) patients presented more than one exacerbation during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS: Most exacerbations seen in primary care are mild. Administration of salbutamol was sufficient for the resolution of these exacerbations. However, treatment after discharge was not compliant with guidelines in most cases. The primary care team was able to resolve most of the asthma exacerbations.

Effectiveness of Spirometry Fundamentals™ for increasing the proper use of spirometry in patients with asthma and COPD.

AIM: To examine whether exposure to the Spirometry Fundamentals™ CD-ROM results in improved quality of spirometry testing in primary care.

METHODS: Spirometry tests performed in 20 intervention and 19 control practices were analysed using American Thoracic Society grades A and B for 'passing' and grades C, D and F for 'failing'. Intervention effects on spirometry quality were assessed using random effects multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS: Adjusted analyses revealed no intervention effect. The likelihood of passing tests was higher in paediatrics-only practices (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32 to 5.12; p=0.01). Hospital or university-based clinics had a lower performance than private or community-based practices in unadjusted analysis (7% vs. 22% passing tests; p=0.05). However, this relationship was not significant in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS: Spirometry Fundamentals™ is insufficient to improve the quality of spirometry in primary care, suggesting the need for more comprehensive multifaceted training resources.

Search