What is in the guidelines about the pharmacological treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Expert Rev Respir Med. 2013 Apr;7(2 Suppl):43-51

Authors: López-Campos JL, Acuña CC

Abstract
With the publication of the new guidelines (The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2011 and Guía Española de la COPD) on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the pharmacological treatment of this disease has changed substantially. In this article, the evidence supporting the use of pharmacological groups in COPD is summarized and the place of each of these drugs among the new therapeutic strategies is established. Although short-acting bronchodilators have been used as maintenance therapy for COPD for many years, few clinical trials are available on the efficacy and safety of these agents, whose role was defined at the very early stages of treatment. The introduction of long-acting bronchodilators, administered every 12 or 24 h, led to an increase in therapeutic effects and an improvement in both treatment adherence and dosage; therefore, both guidelines consider these drugs as the standard therapy for all types of patients and clinical phenotypes. The combination of long-acting bronchodilators from different families has been established as a new therapeutic approach for patients with persistent symptoms despite an appropriate bronchodilator treatment. Anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids has been discussed at length, and is considered in the current guidelines as the treatment of choice in patients with a high risk of exacerbations associated with an impaired lung function or previous exacerbations, or presenting with phenotypes that are susceptible to the effect of corticosteroids. Roflumilast is a novel drug with a clearly defined indication. Finally, further evidence about other therapies, such as antibiotics or mucolytics, is emerging that will help define their appropriate use in selected patients. At present, pharmacological management of COPD is being re-evaluated. As long as we are able to apply the new treatment approaches to the clinical reality of our patients we will achieve greater benefits in both the short and the long term with a reduction in potential complications.

PMID: 23551023 [PubMed - in process]

Related Articles

Histology and Smoking Status Predict Survival of Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of West Japan Oncology Group (WJOG) Study 3906L.

J Thorac Oncol. 2013 Apr 10;

Authors: Kogure Y, Ando M, Saka H, Chiba Y, Yamamoto N, Asami K, Hirashima T, Seto T, Nagase S, Otsuka K, Yanagihara K, Takeda K, Okamoto I, Aoki T, Takayama K, Yamasaki M, Kudoh S, Katakami N, Miyazaki M, Nakagawa K

Abstract
INTRODUCTION:: Smoking status is one of the prognostic factors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, adenocarcinoma (Ad) histology is considered a predictive factor in advanced NSCLC. We investigated the correlation between histology or smoking status and survival of NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS:: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients who started first-line chemotherapy at affiliated institutions of West Japan Oncology Group from 2004 to 2005. We also collected information on pack-years of cigarette smoking and years since cessation. Overall survival was compared using log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. RESULTS:: In total, 2542 consecutive patients were enrolled at 40 institutions. Of those, 71 were excluded because of unknown smoking history. The median overall survival of nonsmoking Ad patients (593 days) was longer than that of smoking Ad, nonsmoking non-Ad, and smoking non-Ad patients (384, 374, and 319 days, respectively; p < 0.001). In Cox regression with sex, age, stage, performance, and treatment as covariates, we found significant interaction (p = 0.039) between histology (Ad/non-Ad) and smoking status (smoker/nonsmoker); smoking conferred a hazard ratio of 1.34 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.55) in Ad, but only 0.99 (0.75-1.31) in non-Ad. Higher pack-years and shorter period since cessation were significantly associated with poorer survival in Ad (p < 0.001), but not in non-Ad (p ≥ 0.434). CONCLUSION:: Ad histology is associated with better prognosis, and only smoking status had a prognostic impact in Ad.

PMID: 23575412 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Related Articles

Severe disease in humans caused by a novel influenza A virus that is distinct from circulating human influenza A viruses is a seminal event. It might herald sporadic human infections from an animal source - e.g., highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A (H5N1) virus; or it might signal the start of an influenza pandemic - e.g., influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus.

Therefore, the discovery of novel influenza A (H7N9) virus infections in three critically ill patients reported in the Journal by Gao and colleagues is of major public health significance. Chinese scientists are to be congratulated for the apparent speed with which . . .