Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

Level of adherence to the GOLD strategy document for management of patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD.

Related Articles

Gold2014The Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy document has been available since 2001. Little is known about level of adherence to the GOLD document among hospital-based health professionals assessing and managing inpatients admitted with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the level of adherence among health professionals to GOLD.

METHODS: A retrospective audit of medical histories was completed on a random sample of 240 patients admitted to hospital with a primary diagnosis of AECOPD within a calendar year. The audit evaluated adherence to GOLD recommendations on appropriateness of hospital and intensive care unit admissions as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological management.

RESULTS: High levels of adherence to indications for hospital admissions (97%), indications for intensive care unit admissions (100%) and prescription of bronchodilators (100%) were observed. However, antibiotics (45%) and oxygen therapy (68%) were over-prescribed. Adherence to non-pharmacological management was poor in areas such as smoking cessation (25%) and pulmonary rehabilitation referrals (16%). Patients admitted under the care of the respiratory team were more likely (odds ratio = 2.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-5.4) to be referred to pulmonary rehabilitation than patients admitted under the general medicine team.

CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals in the respiratory team had better adherence to GOLD as compared to health professionals in other teams. Nonetheless, pharmacological interventions were both appropriately prescribed and also over-prescribed, whereas non-pharmacological interventions were used rarely, suggesting a need for practice review in these areas.

Japanese guideline for adult asthma 2014.

Adult bronchial asthma (hereinafter, asthma) is characterized by chronic airway inflammation, reversible airway narrowing, and airway hyperresponsiveness. Long-standing asthma induces airway remodeling to cause intractable asthma. The number of patients with asthma has increased, and that of patients who die from asthma has decreased (1.5 per 100,000 patients in 2012).

The aim of asthma treatment is to enable patients with asthma to lead a normal life without any symptoms. A good relationship between physicians and patients is indispensable for appropriate treatment. Long-term management with antiasthmatic agents and elimination of the causes and risk factors of asthma are fundamental to its treatment.

Four steps in pharmacotherapy differentiate between mild and intensive treatments; each step includes an appropriate daily dose of an inhaled corticosteroid, varying from low to high. Long-acting β2-agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and sustained-release theophylline are recommended as concomitant drugs, while anti-immunoglobulin E antibody therapy has been recently developed for the most severe and persistent asthma involving allergic reactions. Inhaled β2-agonists, aminophylline, corticosteroids, adrenaline, oxygen therapy, and others are used as needed in acute exacerbations by choosing treatment steps for asthma exacerbations depending on the severity of attacks.

Allergic rhinitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aspirin-induced asthma, pregnancy, asthma in athletes, and cough-variant asthma are also important issues that need to be considered.

Preoperative assessment of lung cancer patients: Evaluating guideline compliance (re-audit).

Lung.cancerGuidelines have been issued for the management of lung cancer patients in the United Kingdom. However, compliance with these national guidelines varies in different thoracic units in the country. We set out to evaluate our thoracic surgery practice and compliance with the national guidelines.

METHODS: An initial audit in 2011 showed deficiencies in practice, thus another audit was conducted to check for improvements in guideline compliance. A retrospective study was carried out over a 12-month period from January 2013 to January 2014 and included all patients who underwent radical surgical resection for lung cancer. Data were collected from computerized records.

RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients had radical surgery for lung cancer between January 2013 and January 2014. Four patients were excluded from the analysis due to incomplete records. Our results showed improvements in our practice compared to our initial audit. More patients underwent surgery within 4 weeks of computed tomography and positron-emission tomography scanning. An improvement was noticed in carbon monoxide transfer factor measurements. Areas for improvement include measurement of carbon monoxide transfer factor in all patients, a cardiology referral in patients at risk of cardiac complications, and the use of a global risk stratification model such as Thoracoscore.

CONCLUSION: Guideline-directed service delivery provision for lung cancer patients leads to improved outcomes. Our results show improvement in our practice compared to our initial audit. We aim to liaise with other thoracic surgery units to get feedback about their practice and any audits regarding adherence to the British Thoracic Society and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines.

Performance of standard procedures in detection of EGFR mutations in daily practice in advanced NSCLC patients selected according to the ESMO guideline: a large Caucasian cohort study.

Related Articles

ESMO consensus recommends EGFR mutation testing in never/former light smokers (<15 pack-years) or patients with non-squamous NSCLC. The aim of this work was to determine the frequency and clinical predictors of EGFR mutations, and the role of specimen sampling tests, in Caucasian standard practice setting.

METHODS: We screened 297 patients according to this consensus. Mutational analysis of EGFR was performed using the Therascreen EGFR RGQ PCR mutation kit. Clinical and pathological correlative data were collected.

RESULTS: An EGFR activating mutation was found in 32 patients (11%), twelve exon 19 deletions, two exon 18 and eighteen exon 21 point mutations. Most were in females, but half were in smokers. Negative TTF-1 staining had a very strong negative predictive value (all except one patient had TTF-1 positive adenocarcinoma). Both biopsies as well as cytology specimens (mainly EBUS-TBNA) did well: 24 mutations in 213 biopsy samples (11.2%) and 8 in 84 cytology samples (9.5%), respectively. The Therascreen acted as a sensitive test in all types of samples: 7 activating mutations were found in samples rated to have <5% of tumour cells, and there were only 4 test failures in the whole series.

CONCLUSION: In this Caucasian standard practice NSCLC cohort, tested according to the ESMO consensus, activating EGFR mutation occurred in 11% of the patients. Half of these were in former/current smokers. With our sampling technique and use of the Therascreen kit, EBUS-TBNA cell blocks performed as good as biopsies.

Community-acquired pneumonia: impact of empirical antibiotic therapy without respiratory fluoroquinolones nor third-generation cephalosporins.

Related Articles

Guidelines for inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) propose to use respiratory fluoroquinolone (RFQ) and/or third-generation cephalosporins (Ceph-3). However, broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant bacteria. We established a guideline in which RFQ and Ceph-3 were excluded as a first course.

Our aim was to evaluate the impact of our therapeutic choices for CAP on the length of hospital stay (LOS) and patient outcome. This was a cohort study of patients with CAP from July 2005 to June 2014. We compared patients benefiting from our guideline established in 2008 to those receiving non-consensual antibiotics. Disease severity was evaluated through the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI). The empirical treatment for PSI III to V was a combination therapy of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (AMX-C) + roxithromycin (RX) or AMX + ofloxacin. Adherence to guidelines was defined by the prescription of one of these antibiotic agents.

Requirement for intensive care or death defined unfavorable outcome. Among 1,370 patients, 847 were treated according to our guideline (61.8 %, group 1) and 523 without concordant therapy (38.2 %, group 2). The mean PSI was similar: 82 vs. 83, p > 0.5. The mean LOS was lower in group 1: 7.6 days vs. 9.1 days, p < 0.001. An unfavorable outcome was less frequent in group 1: 5.4 % vs. 9.9 %, p = 0.001. In logistic regression models, concordant therapy was associated with a favorable outcome: adjusted odds ratio (AOR) [95 % confidence interval (CI)] 1.85 [1.20-2.88], p = 0.005.

CAP therapy without RFQ and Ceph-3 use was associated with a shorter LOS and fewer unfavorable outcomes.

Search