Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

    Vous êtes ici :  
  1. Accueil
  2. Blog With Right Sidebar

Endovascular Therapy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cause of death among hospitalized patients. Treatment escalation beyond anticoagulation therapy is necessary in patients with massive PE (defined by hemodynamic shock) as well as in many patients with submassive PE (defined by right ventricular strain).

The best current evidence suggests that modern catheter-directed therapy to achieve rapid central clot debulking should be considered as an early or first-line treatment option for patients with acute massive PE; and emerging evidence suggests a catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion should be considered as adjunctive therapy for many patients with acute submassive PE.

This article reviews the current approach to endovascular therapy for acute PE in the context of appropriate diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of acute massive and acute submassive PE.

Outpatient imaging for pulmonary embolism may only be suitable for a minority.

In this study we model the impact of introducing outpatient investigation of pulmonary thrombo-embolism (PTE) to the acute medical unit (AMU) using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) decision rule. Specifically, we ask what proportion of patients requiring imaging could be investigated without admission, and how many bed-days this would save.

We obtained records for all medical patients who had imaging for PTE in a six-month period at a large teaching hospital with a 40-bedded AMU. The patients were categorized into suitability for outpatient investigation using a combination of the PESI rule and practical considerations. Three hundred and fifty-nine separate presentations were identified. From available records, 31 patients (9.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.6-12.8%) had no contraindications to outpatient management. These patients used a total of 79 bed-days in the six-month period, or 1.1% (95% CI 0.8-1.5%) of the maximum AMU bed occupancy. Around 10% of patients who require imaging for suspected PTE could be triaged to outpatient investigation using the PESI tool.

Adopting this method to triage patients of ambulatory care, would have only a modest effect on acute medical bed occupancy, but remains a valid option for motivated patients in the low-risk category.

The challenge of diagnosing pulmonary embolism in children, pregnant women, and elderly patients: a descriptive review of the literature.

The prompt and accurate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) greatly influences patient outcomes. However, diagnosing PE is one of the most difficult challenges confronting physicians, even more so when the clinical suspicion is addressed in children, during pregnancy, or in elderly patients. In these patient groups, symptoms and signs from concomitant conditions or diseases may mimic PE and make difficult defining clinical probability categories for PE as usually applied to general adult patients. Moreover, the diagnostic techniques show wider, specific limitations in these settings. PE is considered rare in children.

The diagnostic management of a child with suspected PE is largely extrapolated from the knowledge achieved in adult patients. An increased risk of venous thromboembolism is reported in all trimesters of pregnancy and in the puerperium. An accurate diagnosis of PE in pregnancy has important implications, including the need for prolonged anticoagulation, delivery planning, and prophylaxis during future pregnancies, as well as concerns about future oral contraceptive use and estrogen therapy. Although incidence, morbidity, and mortality increase steadily with age, PE remains an underdiagnosed disease in elderly patients. About 40% of PE found at necropsy were not suspected antemortem.

In the present article, challenges in diagnosing PE in children, during pregnancy, and in the elderly will be discussed, reviewing the available clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic strategies.

Usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: Correlation between CT findings at the site of biopsy with pathological diagnoses.

Usual interstitial pneumonia and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: Correlation between CT findings at the site of biopsy with pathological diagnoses.

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec 12;

Authors: Sumikawa H, Johkoh T, Fujimoto K, Ichikado K, Colby TV, Fukuoka J, Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y, Kataoka K, Yanagawa M, Koyama M, Honda O, Tomiyama N

Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to correlate high-resolution CT (HRCT) findings at the site of biopsy with the whole lung CT and pathologic diagnoses in usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). METHODS: The study included 35 patients (25 UIP and 10 NSIP) diagnosed both pathologically and clinically. 81 surgical biopsy specimens (54 UIP, and 27 NSIP) and extracted areas corresponding to biopsy sites on HRCT were analyzed. CT interpretations were compared with pathological diagnoses in both extracted images and the whole lung. Concordant and discordant cases in multiple extracted images were divided and analyzed. Then the whole cases were categorized by including or not at least one UIP diagnosis of extracted images and evaluated. RESULTS: The diagnoses in extracted sites significantly correlated with pathological diagnoses (p=0.047). There were significant differences in the concordances of extracted images compared with the diagnosis of whole lung and pathology (p=0.008, 0.003, respectively). All 7 cases that were not concordant were diagnosed as radiological UIP with whole lung CT. The cases with at least one UIP diagnosis of extracted CT images were diagnosed as UIP in pathology more frequently (18 in 25) (p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Radiological UIP in whole CT had more frequently discordant diagnoses from multiple extracted images than NSIP. And there were more cases in pathological UIP that included at least one UIP diagnosis of extracted images compared with pathological NSIP.

PMID: 22169358 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Guideline adherence and macrolides reduced mortality in outpatients with pneumonia.

Guideline adherence and macrolides reduced mortality in outpatients with pneumonia.

Respir Med. 2011 Dec 17;

Authors: Asadi L, Eurich DT, Gamble JM, Minhas-Sandhu JK, Marrie TJ, Majumdar SR

Abstract
BACKGROUND: For outpatients with pneumonia, guidelines recommend empiric antibiotics and some suggest macrolides are preferred agents. We hypothesized that both guideline-concordant antibiotics and macrolides would be associated with reduced mortality. METHODS: All outpatients with pneumonia assessed at 7 Emergency Departments in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada were enrolled in a population-based registry that included clinical-radiographic data, Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and treatments. Guideline-concordant regimens included macrolides and respiratory fluoroquinolones; other regimens were "discordant". Main outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The study included 2973 outpatients; mean age 51 years, 47% female, most had mild pneumonia (73% PSI Class I-II). Over 30-days, 38 (1%) patients died, 228 (8%) were hospitalized, and 253 (9%) reached the endpoint of death or hospitalization. Most (2845 [96%]) patients received guideline-concordant antibiotics. Compared to patients receiving discordant antibiotics, those receiving guideline-concordant antibiotics were less likely to die within 30-days (8 [6%] versus 30 [1%], adjusted OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.59, p = 0.002). Within the guideline-concordant subgroup, compared to the 947 (33%) patients treated with fluoroquinolones, those receiving macrolides [1847 (64%)] were less likely to die (25 [3%] versus 4 [0.2%], adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.86, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In outpatients with pneumonia, treatment with guideline-concordant antibiotics and macrolides were both associated with mortality reduction.

PMID: 22182341 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Search

Search