Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

How and when to use genetic markers for nonsmall cell lung cancer

imagePurpose of reviewMany driver mutations that determine the malignant behavior of lung cancer have been identified in recent years. The promise of therapies targeted to the specific molecular pathways altered by such mutations has made genetic testing in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) attractive to clinicians. We reviewed recent research on clinically relevant genetic and molecular tests for patients with NSCLC, with an emphasis on the tests linked to actionable mutations that influence therapy and improve outcomes.

Recent findings : Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) and translocations involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene have been shown to be common driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. The presence or absence of these mutations has been demonstrated to predict response to targeted therapy in many recent studies. Targeted therapies for patients with mutations in the EGFR domain or the echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocation have been shown to be effective and are approved for use. Ongoing studies continue to define the extent of their utility and may continue to expand their indications. Sufficient tissue for genetic analysis can be obtained from cytologic samples, including those obtained from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.

Summary : Genetic testing for driver mutations is useful in identifying patients with NSCLC who are likely to respond to targeted therapy. These tests are best used in patients with adenocarcinoma who have advanced-stage cancer.

Image-guided pleural biopsy

imageThe most efficient and cost-effective approach to pleural exudates not diagnosed by means of thoracocentesis remains uncertain. Both closed pleural biopsy and thoracoscopy may be utilized for the acquisition of pleural tissue. This review will focus on the developments in image guidance of closed pleural biopsy.

Recent findings : Recent studies suggest that computed tomography and ultrasound guidance improve the yield and safety of closed pleural biopsy. Imaging is best suited to reduce the rate of false-negative biopsy in malignant pleural disease by enhanced targeting of localized pleural changes typically situated dorsolaterally close to the diaphragm. Pleural tuberculosis causes effusions with discrete and uniformly distributed pleural thickening, and evidence suggests that the utilization of imaging has little advantage in this setting apart from decreasing the risk associated with blind biopsy. Imaging also facilitates a directed repeat thoracocentesis in the same session. The cumulative yield of image-assisted repeat thoracocentesis and pleural biopsy has been reported to approach that of thoracoscopy, particularly in cases with pleural thickening, nodularity or pleural-based mass lesions.

Summary : Image-guided pleural biopsy combined with repeat thoracocentesis is a safe, inexpensive, accessible and sensitive method for further examination of patients with pleural exudates not diagnosed by initial thoracocentesis.

Probiotics: A new way to fight bacterial pulmonary infections?

Related Articles

Antibiotics, of which Fleming has identified the first representative, penicillin, in 1928, allowed dramatical improvement of the treatment of patients presenting with infectious diseases. However, once an antibiotic is used, resistance may develop more or less rapidly in some bacteria. It is thus necessary to develop therapeutic alternatives, such as the use of probiotics, defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) as "micro-organisms which, administered live and in adequate amounts, confer a benefit to the health of the host".

The scope of these micro-organisms is broad, concerning many areas including that of infectious diseases, especially respiratory infections. We describe the rational use of probiotics in respiratory tract infections and detail the results of various clinical studies describing the use of probiotics in the management of respiratory infections such as nosocomial or community acquired pneumonia, or on specific grounds such as cystic fibrosis.

The results are sometimes contradictory, but the therapeutic potential of probiotics seems promising. Implementing research to understand their mechanisms of action is critical to conduct therapeutic tests based on a specific rational for the strains to be used, the dose, as well as the chosen mode and rhythm of administration.

Pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and high-dose levofloxacin in severe lower respiratory tract infections.

Related Articles

This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of intravenous moxifloxacin 400mg once and levofloxacin 500mg twice daily in patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and assessed their pharmacodynamic adequacy against common respiratory pathogens.

Eighteen patients with LRTIs hospitalised in general wards were included. Serial blood samples were obtained at steady state and concentrations were determined using HPLC. Pharmacokinetic variables were estimated by a two-compartment model. The characteristic pharmacodynamic parameter for fluoroquinolones (AUC0-24/MIC) was calculated.

Peak and trough concentrations were, respectively, 4.81±1.03 and 0.59±1.13mg/L for moxifloxacin and 6.42±1.08 and 0.79±0.39mg/L for levofloxacin. Pharmacokinetic data for moxifloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively, were: CL, 10.27±1.24 and 22.66±6.62L/h; t1/2, 13.43±5.12 and 6.75±1.34h; Vss, 163.03±53.88 and 170.73±39.59L; and AUC0-24, 39.38±5.28 and 47.06±14.09mg·h/L. The pharmacodynamic target was attained in all patients by both antibiotics against the majority of respiratory pathogens. Moxifloxacin proved to be pharmacodynamically efficacious against Gram-positive bacteria with MICs≤0.79mg/L and Gram-negative bacteria with MICs≤0.32mg/L. These MIC thresholds for levofloxacin were 1.1mg/L and 0.38mg/L, respectively.

Moxifloxacin and high-dose levofloxacin show a favourable pharmacokinetic profile in plasma of patients with severe LRTIs, without significant interpatient variability. They ensure optimal pharmacodynamic exposure against the majority of microbes involved in these infections. However, the predicted efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria with MICs≥0.5mg/L appears to be low.

Interhuman transmissibility of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: estimation of pandemic risk.

Related Articles

The new Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection shares many clinical, epidemiological, and virological similarities with that of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV. We aimed to estimate virus transmissibility and the epidemic potential of MERS-CoV, and to compare the results with similar findings obtained for prepandemic SARS.

METHODS: We retrieved data for MERS-CoV clusters from the WHO summary and subsequent reports, and published descriptions of cases, and took into account 55 of the 64 laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS-CoV reported as of June 21, 2013, excluding cases notified in the previous 2 weeks. To assess the interhuman transmissibility of MERS-CoV, we used Bayesian analysis to estimate the basic reproduction number (R0) and compared it to that of prepandemic SARS. We considered two scenarios, depending on the interpretation of the MERS-CoV cluster-size data.

RESULTS: With our most pessimistic scenario (scenario 2), we estimated MERS-CoV R0 to be 0·69 (95% CI 0·50-0·92); by contrast, the R0 for prepandemic SARS-CoV was 0·80 (0·54-1·13). Our optimistic scenario (scenario 1) yielded a MERS-CoV R0 of 0·60 (0·42-0·80). Because of recent implementation of effective contact tracing and isolation procedures, further MERS-CoV transmission data might no longer describe an entire cluster, but only secondary infections directly caused by the index patient. Hence, we calculated that, under scenario 2, eight or more secondary infections caused by the next index patient would translate into a 5% or higher chance that the revised MERS-CoV R0 would exceed 1-ie, that MERS-CoV might have pandemic potential.

INTERPRETATION: Our analysis suggests that MERS-CoV does not yet have pandemic potential. We recommend enhanced surveillance, active contact tracing, and vigorous searches for the MERS-CoV animal hosts and transmission routes to human beings.

FUNDING: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Labex Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases), and the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme project PREDEMICS.

Search