Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

Aeroallergen and food IgE sensitization and local and systemic inflammation in asthma.

Related Articles

Aeroallergen and food IgE sensitization and local and systemic inflammation in asthma.

Allergy. 2014 Jan 7;

Authors: Patelis A, Janson C, Borres MP, Nordvall L, Alving K, Malinovschi A

Abstract
BACKGROUND: We recently reported an independent association between IgE sensitization to food allergens and increased airway inflammation, assessed by fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), in a population-based study (J Allergy Clin Immunol, 130, 2012, 397). Similar studies have not been performed in populations with asthma. The aim of the present study was to investigate the allergic sensitization profile in asthmatics and examine FeNO, airway responsiveness and blood eosinophilia in relation to type and degree of IgE sensitization.
METHOD: FeNO, airway responsiveness, blood eosinophil count (B-Eos) and IgE sensitization to food allergens and aeroallergens were determined in 408 subjects with asthma, aged 10-34 years.
RESULTS: Asthmatics had higher prevalence of IgE sensitization against all allergens than controls (P < 0.001). Mite, pollen, furry animal, mould and food sensitizations were each associated with increased FeNO, airway responsiveness and B-Eos in asthmatics. IgE sensitization to mould, furry animals and food allergens was independently related to FeNO (all P < 0.05) after adjustment for age, sex, height, smoking history and medication. IgE sensitization to mould (P < 0.001) and furry animals (P = 0.02) was related to airway responsiveness in a similar model. Finally, IgE sensitization to mould (P = 0.001), furry animals (P < 0.001) and food allergens (P < 0.001) was independently related to B-Eos.
CONCLUSION: Independent effects of IgE sensitization to aeroallergens (furry animals and mould) and food allergens were found on both local and systemic markers of inflammation in asthma. The finding regarding food IgE sensitization is novel, and a clinical implication might be that even food sensitization must be assessed to fully understand inflammation patterns in asthma.

PMID: 24397423 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Asthma control in patients on fixed dose combination evaluated with mannitol challenge test.

Related Articles

Asthma control in patients on fixed dose combination evaluated with mannitol challenge test.

Respir Med. 2014 Feb;108(2):264-70

Authors: Romberg KA, Berggren AC, Bjermer L

Abstract
Asthma is often difficult to control and it is likely that not all patients are optimally treated. This study aimed to explore asthma control in adults receiving fixed dose combination (FDC) therapy. Control of asthma was assessed using the mannitol challenge test as a monitoring tool to see if this would give additional information compared to the asthma control test (ACT). The study was an open-label, prospective study on 98 adults prescribed with FDC therapies for at least three months. 74 patients considered that their asthma was well controlled. However, 60 patients had a positive mannitol challenge test (PD15 < 635 mg), and when those with a positive response to the short-acting β2-agonist (≥15%) after the mannitol challenge test were included, this increased to 64 patients (65%). Exploratory analysis determined that the spirometry parameters; FEV1/FVC and FEV1% of predicted, were statistically significant predictors of a positive mannitol challenge test. Co-morbid conditions such as concomitant upper airway involvement or eczema did not predict mannitol reactivity. Although most patients rated their asthma as well controlled, many provided a positive mannitol challenge test, suggesting the presence of underlying inflammation, despite treatment with fixed dose combination therapy.

PMID: 24406244 [PubMed - in process]

Safety of benzodiazepines and opioids in very severe respiratory disease: national prospective study.

Related Articles

Safety of benzodiazepines and opioids in very severe respiratory disease: national prospective study.

BMJ. 2014;348:g445

Authors: Ekström MP, Bornefalk-Hermansson A, Abernethy AP, Currow DC

Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of benzodiazepines and opioids in patients with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
DESIGN: Population based longitudinal consecutive cohort study.
SETTING: Centres prescribing long term oxygen therapy in Sweden.
PATIENTS: 2249 patients starting long term oxygen therapy for COPD in Sweden between 2005 and 2009 in the national Swedevox Register.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Effects of benzodiazepines and opioids on rates of admission to hospital and mortality, adjusted for age, sex, arterial blood gases, body mass index (BMI), performance status, previous admissions, comorbidities, and concurrent drugs.
RESULTS: 1681 (76%) patients were admitted to hospital, and 1129 (50%) died under observation. No patient was lost to follow-up. Benzodiazepines and opioids were not associated with increased admission: hazard ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.10) and 0.98 (0.86 to 1.10), respectively. Benzodiazepines were associated with increased mortality (1.21, 1.05 to 1.39) with a dose response trend. Opioids also had a dose response relation with mortality: lower dose opioids (≤ 30 mg oral morphine equivalents a day) were not associated with increased mortality (1.03, 0.84 to 1.26) in contrast with higher dose opioids (1.21, 1.02 to 1.44). Concurrent benzodiazepines and opioids in lower doses were not associated with increased admissions (0.86, 0.53 to 1.42) or mortality (1.25, 0.78 to 1.99). Associations were not modified by being naive to the drugs or by hypercapnia.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower dose opioids are not associated with increased admissions or deaths in patients with COPD and might be safe for symptom reduction in severe respiratory disease.

PMID: 24482539 [PubMed - in process]

Efficacy of indacaterol on quality of life and pulmonary function in patients with COPD and inhaler device preferences.

Related Articles

Efficacy of indacaterol on quality of life and pulmonary function in patients with COPD and inhaler device preferences.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:107-14

Authors: Ohno T, Wada S, Hanada S, Sawaguchi H, Muraki M, Tohda Y

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Indacaterol is a novel, once-daily, inhaled, long-acting b2-agonist for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy of indacaterol on quality of life and pulmonary function in patients with COPD in a real-world setting, and also to evaluate its inhaler device (Breezhaler®), which is important for both adherence and management.
METHODS: Twenty-eight outpatients with COPD were treated with indacaterol (150 μg once daily for 8 weeks), and the effects on pulmonary function were evaluated using a questionnaire survey with the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and COPD assessment test (CAT) before and after treatment. Similar investigations were also performed separately among different baseline medications. Moreover, original questionnaire surveys for indacaterol and its device were performed.
RESULTS: Overall, mMRC dyspnea scale and CAT scores significantly improved (1.96±1.04 to 1.57±1.07 and 17.39±8.23 to 12.82±8.42, respectively; P<0.05). Significant improvements in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were also observed on pulmonary function tests (2.91±0.66 L to 3.07±0.65 L and 1.46±0.60 L to 1.58±0.59 L, respectively; P<0.05). Replacement therapy from salmeterol to indacaterol significantly improved mMRC and FVC values, but did not significantly improve CAT scores or other pulmonary functions. Add-on therapy with indacaterol significantly improved mMRC score, CAT score, FVC, and FEV1, regardless of whether tiotropium was used as a baseline treatment. All subjects in a questionnaire survey found the inhaler device easy to use. There were no serious adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation.
CONCLUSION: Indacaterol is thought to be effective and well tolerated as a bronchodilator for the management of COPD. Treatment with indacaterol in addition to a long-acting muscarinic antagonist was also useful.

PMID: 24489464 [PubMed - in process]

In vitro diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy and further development of component resolved diagnostics.

Related Articles

In vitro diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy and further development of component resolved diagnostics.

Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014 Feb 4;

Authors: Ebo DG, Van Vaerenbergh M, de Graaf DC, Bridts CH, De Clerck LS, Sabato V

Abstract
For most people Hymenoptera stings result in transient and bothersome local inflammatory responses characterized by pain, itching, redness and swelling. In contrast, for those presenting an IgE-mediated allergic reaction, a re-sting may cause life-threatening reactions. In such patients, correct diagnosis is an absolute prerequisite for effective management, i.e. venom-specific immunotherapy. Generally, identification of the offending insect involves a detailed history along with quantification of venom-specific IgE antibodies and venom skin tests. Unfortunately, due to uncertainties associated with both tests, correct diagnosis is not always straightforward. This review summarizes the potentials and limitations of the various in vitro tests that are currently being used in the diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Particular attention is paid to the potential of novel cellular tests such as basophil activation tests and component-resolved diagnosis with recombinant venom allergens in the diagnostic approach of patients with difficult diagnosis, i.e. cases in whom traditional venom specific IgE and skin tests yield equivocal or negative results. Finally, this review also covers the recent discoveries in the field of proteome research of Hymenoptera venoms and the selection of cell types for recombinant allergens production.

PMID: 24490811 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Search