Related Articles

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It has been hypothesized that increased cleanliness, reduced family size, and subsequent decreased microbial exposure could explain the increases in global asthma prevalence. This review considers the recent evidence for and against the 'hygiene hypothesis'.

RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence does not provide unequivocal support for the hygiene hypothesis: the hygiene hypothesis specifically relates to atopic asthma, but some of the protective effects (e.g. farm exposures) appear to apply to both atopic and nonatopic asthma; asthma prevalence has begun to decline in some western countries, but there is little evidence that they have become less clean; Latin American countries with high infection rates have high asthma prevalence and the hygiene hypothesis relates to early-life exposures, but exposures throughout life may be important.

SUMMARY: There is a considerable body of evidence which warrants scepticism about the hygiene hypothesis. However, these anomalies contradict the 'narrow' version of it in which microbial pressure early in life protects against atopic asthma by suppressing T-helper 2 immune responses. It is possible that a more general version of the hygiene hypothesis is still valid, but the aetiologic mechanisms involved are currently unclear.

Characterization of Long-Acting Beta(2)-Adrenergic Agonists Utilization in Asthma Patients.

J Asthma. 2012 Oct 30;

Authors: Kaplan S, Zhou EH, Iyasu S

Abstract
Objective. Because of the serious safety risks, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recommended that long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonists (LABAs) be reserved for patients whose asthma cannot be adequately managed with asthma control medication. The objective of the study is to assess prescribing patterns for LABAs prior to the FDA's drug safety communication issued on 2 June 2010. Methods. Data were extracted from IMS Health Plan Claims database for asthma patients who had a new LABA therapy during 2005-2009. The proportion of LABA incident episodes preceded by inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) was examined. The medication-concurrent ratio (MCR), defined as the ratio of overlapping therapy days of single-ingredient (SI) LABAs and non-LABA products to the total days of SI LABAs, was calculated. Four criteria were used to estimate poorly controlled asthma prior to LABA initiation. Results. Of the 228 047 asthma patients, fixed-dose combination (FDC) LABAs were used by the majority of patients (96%). Prior use of ICS or LTRAs was observed in 64% and 31% of SI and FDC LABA incident episodes, respectively. The median MCR for SI LABAs was 62%. Approximately half of the patients met at least one criterion for poorly controlled asthma prior to LABA use. Conclusions. Substantial proportion of patients was prescribed LABAs without prior use of ICS or LTRAs, or other indicators of poor asthma control. These findings suggest that asthma guidelines were not entirely followed in clinical practice during the study period.

PMID: 23106094 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Related Articles

Adherence in asthma is an important cause for concern. Although nearly 50% of asthma patients are considered poorly adherent to therapeutic advices, adherence is still difficult to assess, understand and improve despite major medical consequences.

In this review, we revisited the literature of the last 10 years related to adherence in severe asthma. The concepts have changed and "compliance" is usually replaced by "adherence". Assessment of adherence is addressing ethical issues, but provides important insight into difficult-to-treat asthma. Different tools have been used but none is routinely recommended. Health-related outcomes (poor control, exacerbations, hospitalizations, lung function decline), which are clearly associated with severe asthma, are often worsened by non-adherence with consequences also on patient related outcomes (quality of life).

The potential behaviour associated with non-adherence and all other related factors including easy-to-recognize psychological traits can help for patient's future management. Therapeutic educational interventions have been recognized with a scientifically proven efficiency even though evolution and improvements are needed. A multidisciplinary approach is required in severe asthma. Therapeutic adherence for a given patient is always a prerequisite to any other aspects when addressing severe asthma phenotypes.

Severe asthma should be considered only in those who still experienced poor asthma outcomes despite optimal adherence. At a glance, poor adherence and severe asthma should be considered antinomic. Better understanding of the causes and customised management are potential future directions.