Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

Regulatory aspects of Phase 3 endpoints for new inhaled antibiotics for cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Related Articles

Regulatory aspects of Phase 3 endpoints for new inhaled antibiotics for cystic fibrosis patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012 Aug;25(4):198-203

Authors: Montgomery AB, Abuan T, Yeager MA

Abstract
Available regulatory guidelines for developing inhaled anti-infective therapies offer general advice, but specific guidance often provides conflicting and outdated advice in regard to clinical trial design. For instance, the availability of two approved drugs makes the conduct of placebo-controlled trials longer than 28 days problematic. Comparator drugs require use per the product label, making comparator trials difficult to blind as taste, foaming, regimen, device, and delivery time differences are present. Currently, there is no consensus on the most appropriate endpoints for evaluation of aerosolized antimicrobials. FEV(1) is a surrogate endpoint that it is a predictor of mortality--it is standardized, reproducible, noninvasive, simple, and inexpensive to perform but small statistically significant changes may not be clinically important. FEV(1) improvement also has a ceiling effect in patients with mild lung function impairment and spirometry cannot be reliably done in patients under the age of 6 years. A patient-reported outcome is a promising clinical endpoint. However, there is not currently an accepted tool that can be used as a primary endpoint for the FDA or the EMA, although the latter recognizes the CFQ-R as a validated secondary endpoint and the FDA grandfathered acceptance of the CFQ-R respiratory domain in the pivotal aztreonam for inhalation study. Exacerbations are an important clinical endpoint that reflects morbidity and are a major driver of cost of care, but they occur infrequently and a standardized definition has not been reached. Furthermore, an exacerbation endpoint may fail even with an otherwise effective antibiotic therapy. Regulatory authorities will have a difficult time approving any new inhaled antibiotic based on one clinical endpoint alone.

PMID: 22857271 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

The Hajj: updated health hazards and current recommendations for 2012.

Related Articles

The Hajj: updated health hazards and current recommendations for 2012.

Euro Surveill. 2012;17(41):20295

Authors: Al-Tawfiq JA, Memish ZA

Abstract
This year the Hajj will take place during 24-29 October. Recent outbreaks of Ebola haemorrhagic fever in Uganda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, cholera in Sierra Leone, and infections associated with a novel coronavirus in Saudi Arabia and Qatar required review of the health recommendations of the 2012 Hajj. Current guidelines foresee mandatory vaccination with quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine for all pilgrims, and yellow fever and poliomyelitis vaccine for pilgrims from high-risk countries. Influenza vaccine is strongly recommended.

PMID: 23078811 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

A Comparative Study of Two Nebulizers in the Emergency Department: Breath-Actuated Nebulizer and Handheld Nebulizer.

Related Articles

A Comparative Study of Two Nebulizers in the Emergency Department: Breath-Actuated Nebulizer and Handheld Nebulizer.

J Emerg Nurs. 2013 Jan 29;

Authors: Parone D, Stauss M, Reed CR, Sherman B, Smith L, Johnson R, Milcarek B, Hunter K

Abstract
BACKGROUND: The breath-actuated nebulizer (BAN) and the handheld nebulizer (HHN) are 2 nebulizers used in the ED of Cooper University Hospital. The purpose of this study was to compare the nebulizers to identify which device resulted in a resolution of symptoms with fewer treatments. The primary hypothesis was that adult ED patients with a chief complaint of wheezing and dyspnea who were given nebulized treatments via the BAN would require less nebulizer treatments than those patients given nebulized treatments via HHN. In addition, the secondary purposes of the study was to determine if the BAN would have significantly higher peak expiratory flow measurements, lower Modified Borg Score, overall decreased respiratory rate, and lower heart rates compared to subjects receiving nebulized treatments via HHN. METHODS: A single-site, prospective, randomized, comparative design study was conducted in the ED between March 2010 and February 2011. Fifty-four subjects presenting with dyspnea and wheezing and an Emergency Severity Index of 3 or 4 were enrolled and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups (BAN or HHN). Subjects were administered 1 to 3 nebulizer treatments (#1 ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate, #2 ipratropium bromide and albuterol sulfate, #3 albuterol sulfate), which was consistent with the ED Advanced Nursing Guideline for Wheezing. Nebulizer treatments were discontinued if a patient's dyspnea or wheezing resolved. IRB approval was obtained prior to study commencement. RESULTS: There was no significant difference found between the HHN and BAN in respect to number of treatments, respiratory rate, peak flow measurements, and Modified Borg scores in the 54 subjects. There was a difference of 7 points in pulse rate between the pre- and post-second BAN treatment (n = 51, P = 0.01). Subjects in the BAN group who completed all 3 treatments (n = 18) had a total treatment time that was on average of 10 minutes longer than those in the HHN group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated no clinical difference between the BAN and HHN in terms of respiratory rate, peak flow, perception of dyspnea, and number of treatments. It is possible that the longer treatment times account for the elevated pulse rate. The data suggests that the higher cost and the longer treatment time do not justify the use of the BAN in this setting. We recommend that these devices be tested with a larger sample size to further test the differences between these 2 devices.

PMID: 23369770 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Clinical control of asthma associates with measures of airway inflammation.

Related Articles

Clinical control of asthma associates with measures of airway inflammation.

Thorax. 2013 Jan;68(1):19-24

Authors: Volbeda F, Broekema M, Lodewijk ME, Hylkema MN, Reddel HK, Timens W, Postma DS, ten Hacken NH

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Control of asthma is the goal of asthma management worldwide. The Global Initiative for Asthma defined control by a composite measure of clinical findings and future risk but without using markers of airway inflammation, the hallmark of asthma. We investigated whether clinical asthma control reflects eosinophilic inflammation in a broad population.
METHODS: Control of asthma was assessed over a period of 4 weeks in 111 patients with asthma: 22 totally controlled, 47 well controlled and 42 uncontrolled. Lung function, quality of life, airway hyperresponsiveness to AMP, sputum and blood eosinophils, exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and bronchial biopsies were obtained.
RESULTS: The 69 subjects with controlled asthma (totally and well controlled combined) had lower median blood eosinophil numbers, slope of AMP hyperresponsiveness, and alveolar NO levels than the 42 subjects with uncontrolled asthma: 0.18 (range 0.01-0.54) versus 0.22 (0.06-1.16) × 10(9)/litre (p<0.05), 3.8 (-0.4-17 750) versus 39.7 (0.4-28 000) mg/ml (p<0.05) and 5.3 (1.5-14.9) versus 6.7 (2.6-51.7) ppb (p<0.05) respectively. Biopsies from subjects with controlled asthma contained fewer eosinophilic granules and more intact epithelium than uncontrolled subjects: 113 (6-1787) versus 219 (19-5313) (p<0.05) and 11.8% (0-65.3) versus 5.6% (0-47.6) (p<0.05) respectively. Controlled asthmatics had better Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores than uncontrolled patients: 6.7 (5.0-7.0) versus 5.9 (3.7-7.0) (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The level of asthma control, based on a composite measure of clinical findings, is associated with inflammatory markers, particularly eosinophilic inflammation, with little difference between totally controlled and well controlled asthma.

PMID: 23042704 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling.

Related Articles

Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling.

J Pathol. 2013 Jan;229(2):176-85

Authors: Mantovani A, Biswas SK, Galdiero MR, Sica A, Locati M

Abstract
Mononuclear phagocyte plasticity includes the expression of functions related to the resolution of inflammation, tissue repair and remodelling, particularly when these cells are set in an M2 or an M2-like activation mode. Macrophages are credited with an essential role in remodelling during ontogenesis. In extraembryonic life, under homeostatic conditions, the macrophage trophic and remodelling functions are recapitulated in tissues such as bone, mammary gland, decidua and placenta. In pathology, macrophages are key components of tissue repair and remodelling that occur during wound healing, allergy, parasite infection and cancer. Interaction with cells bearing stem or progenitor cell properties is likely an important component of the role of macrophages in repair and remodelling. These properties of cells of the monocyte-macrophage lineage may represent a tool and a target for therapeutic exploitation.

PMID: 23096265 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Search