Login to your account

Username *
Password *
Remember Me

Blog With Right Sidebar

Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Illnesses Comparing Older to Young Adults.

Related Articles

Coronavirus and Other Respiratory Illnesses Comparing Older to Young Adults.

Am J Med. 2015 Jun 15;

Authors: Gorse GJ, Donovan MM, Patel GB, Balasubramanian S, Lusk RH

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Study of human coronavirus and other virus-associated respiratory illnesses is needed to describe their clinical effects on chronically ill, older adults.
METHODS: A prospective study during 2009-2013 clinically assessed acute respiratory illnesses soon after onset and 3-4 weeks later in patients aged ≥60 years old with chronic lung and heart diseases (Group 1, 100 subjects), and healthy adults aged 18-40 years (Group 2, 101 subjects). Respiratory secretions were tested for nucleic acids of a panel of respiratory viruses. Rise in antibody titer was assessed for four coronavirus strains.
RESULTS: Virus-associated illnesses (29 [39.1%] of 74 illnesses in Group 1 and 59 [48.7%] of 121 illnesses in Group 2) occurred in all calendar quarters, most commonly in the first and fourth. Coronaviruses (Group 1: 14 [18.9%] illnesses; Group 2: 26 [21.5%] illnesses and entero/rhinoviruses (Group 1: 14 [18.9%] illnesses; Group 2: 37 [30.6%] illnesses) were most common. Virus co-infections occurred in 10 illnesses. Illnesses with 9 to 11 symptoms were more common in Group 1 (17 [23.0%]) than 2 (15 [12.4%]) (P<0.05). Compared to Group 2, more Group 1 subjects reported dyspnea, more severe disease of longer duration, and treatment for acute illness with prednisone and antibiotics. Coronavirus-associated illnesses (percent of illnesses, Group 1 vs. Group 2) were characterized by myalgias (21% vs. 68%, P<0.01), chills (50% vs. 52%), dyspnea (71% vs. 24%, P<0.01), headache (64% vs. 72%), malaise (64% vs. 84%), cough (86% vs. 68%), sputum production (86% vs. 60%), sore throat (64% vs. 80%) and nasal congestion (93% vs. 96%).
CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory illnesses were commonly associated with coronaviruses and entero/rhinoviruses, affecting chronically ill, older patients more than healthy, young adults.

PMID: 26087047 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Histologic classification of non-small-cell lung cancer over time: reducing the rates of not-otherwise-specified.

Related Articles

Histologic classification of non-small-cell lung cancer over time: reducing the rates of not-otherwise-specified.

Curr Oncol. 2015 Jun;22(3):e164-70

Authors: Ho C, Tong KM, Ramsden K, Ionescu DN, Laskin J

Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of histologic classification in selecting the appropriate systemic therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) came to attention in 2007. In British Columbia, that information was communicated through international and national meetings, our centralized cancer care program, and to the medical community at large in multidisciplinary forums. We examined the effects of those education programs on the categorization of nsclc and associated systemic treatment practices.
METHODS: The BC Cancer Agency provides cancer care to 4.6 million residents of British Columbia. A retrospective review of all stage iiib and ivnsclc patients referred in 2007 and 2011 collected baseline characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Histology was classified using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition, for the Canadian Cancer Registry.
RESULTS: In 2007, 671 patients were referred, and 170 received chemotherapy; in 2011, the relevant figures were 680 and 197 respectively. Baseline characteristics in the cohorts were not statistically significantly different in 2007 and 2011. Histologic classifications in 2007 were 41% nonsquamous, 13% squamous, and 46% not otherwise specified (nos); in 2011, they were 63%, 17%, and 20% respectively. Exposure to pemetrexed in any line of therapy in 2007 was 22% for nonsquamous, 17% for squamous, and 10% for nos; in 2011, exposure was 39%, 3%, and 37% respectively. Exposure to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (egfrtki) in 2007 was 36%, 22%, and 33%; in 2011, it was 64%, 60%, and 63%. Median overall survival duration, 2007 versus 2011, was 3.25 months versus 3.57 months with best supportive care, and 11.31 months versus 11.54 months with chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The specificity of nsclc histologic categorization improved in 2011 compared with 2007, with a reduction of 26 percentage points in the rate of nos disease. The proportion of patients treated with chemotherapy over time remained the same, but the use of pemetrexed and egfrtki increased. The increased accuracy in histologic classification resulted in more appropriate utilization of systemic drugs.

PMID: 26089727 [PubMed]

Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Related Articles

Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015 Jun 19;:1-13

Authors: Lee YR, Houngue C, Hall RG

Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia is the sixth leading cause of death in the USA. Adherence to the 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society community-acquired pneumonia guidelines has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. However, choice between guideline-recommended treatments is at the discretion of the prescribing clinician. This review is intended to discuss the characteristics of these treatment options including dosing frequency, dose adjustment for renal/hepatic dysfunction, serious/common adverse events, drug interactions, lung penetration, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target and effect of obesity to help guide antimicrobial selection. An increasing portion of patients are receiving expanded empiric coverage for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as recommended by the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America for healthcare-associated pneumonia. However, this expanded coverage may not be achieving the desired improvements in clinical outcomes. We expect this increasingly diverse spectrum of patients with pneumonia to eventually result in the merger of these two guidelines to include all patients with pneumonia.

PMID: 26091895 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Using a mobile health application to support self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a six-month cohort study.

Related Articles

Using a mobile health application to support self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a six-month cohort study.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15(1):46

Authors: Hardinge M, Rutter H, Velardo C, Shah SA, Williams V, Tarassenko L, Farmer A

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Self-management strategies have the potential to support patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Telehealth interventions may have a role in delivering this support along with the opportunity to monitor symptoms and physiological variables. This paper reports findings from a six-month, clinical, cohort study of COPD patients' use of a mobile telehealth based (mHealth) application and how individually determined alerts in oxygen saturation levels, pulse rate and symptoms scores related to patient self-initiated treatment for exacerbations.
METHODS: The development of the mHealth intervention involved a patient focus group and multidisciplinary team of researchers, engineers and clinicians. Individual data thresholds to set alerts were determined, and the relationship to exacerbations, defined by the initiation of stand-by medications, was measured. The sample comprised 18 patients (age range of 50-85 years) with varied levels of computer skills.
RESULTS: Patients identified no difficulties in using the mHealth application and used all functions available. 40 % of exacerbations had an alert signal during the three days prior to a patient starting medication. Patients were able to use the mHealth application to support self- management, including monitoring of clinical data. Within three months, 95 % of symptom reporting sessions were completed in less than 100 s.
CONCLUSIONS: Home based, unassisted, daily use of the mHealth platform is feasible and acceptable to people with COPD for reporting daily symptoms and medicine use, and to measure physiological variables such as pulse rate and oxygen saturation. These findings provide evidence for integrating telehealth interventions with clinical care pathways to support self-management in COPD.

PMID: 26084626 [PubMed - in process]

LAMA/LABA vs ICS/LABA in the treatment of COPD in Japan based on the disease phenotypes.

Related Articles


In the combined use of bronchodilators of different classes, ie, long-acting β2-agonists (LABAs) and long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), bronchodilation is obtained both directly, through LABA-mediated stimulation of β2-adrenergic receptors, and indirectly, through LAMA-mediated inhibition of acetylcholine action at muscarinic receptors. The clinical trial data for LABAs/LAMAs in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue to be promising, and these combinations will provide the convenience of delivering the two major bronchodilator classes, recommended as first-line maintenance options in COPD treatment guidelines. COPD is a complex condition that has pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations. These clinical manifestations are highly variable, and several are associated with different responses to currently available therapies. The concept of a COPD phenotype is rapidly evolving from one focusing on the clinical characteristics to one linking the underlying biology to the phenotype of the disease. Identification of the peculiarities of the different COPD phenotypes will permit us to implement a more personalized treatment in which the patient's characteristics, together with his or her genotype, will be key to choosing the best treatment option. At present in Japan, fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) and LABAs are frequently prescribed in the earlier stages of COPD. However, ICSs increase the risk of pneumonia. Notably, 10%-30% of patients with COPD with or without a history of asthma have persistent circulating and airway eosinophilia associated with an increased risk of exacerbations and sensitivity to steroids. Thus, sputum or blood eosinophil counts might identify a subpopulation in which ICSs could have potentially deleterious effects as well as a subpopulation that benefits from ICSs. In this review, I propose one plausible approach to position ICSs and LABAs/LAMAs in clinical practice, based on both the extent of airflow obstruction and the presence of an asthma component or airway eosinophilic inflammation. This approach is a tentative move toward personalized treatment for COPD patients, and with progress in knowledge and developments in physiology, lung imaging, medical biology, and genetics, identification of COPD phenotypes that provide prognostic and therapeutic information that can affect clinically meaningful outcomes is an urgent medical need.

Search