Serum specific IgE or skin prick tests are less useful at levels below accepted decision points.

Objectives: We sought to develop and validate a model to predict food challenge outcome by using routinely collected data in a diverse sample of children considered suitable for food challenge.

Methods: The proto-algorithm was generated by using a limited data set from 1 service (phase 1). We retrospectively applied, evaluated, and modified the initial model by using an extended data set in another center (phase 2). Finally, we prospectively validated the model in a blind study in a further group of children undergoing food challenge for peanut, milk, or egg in the second center (phase 3). Allergen-specific models were developed for peanut, egg, and milk.

Results: Phase 1 (N = 429) identified 5 clinical factors associated with diagnosis of food allergy by food challenge. In phase 2 (N = 289), we examined the predictive ability of 6 clinical factors: skin prick test, serum specific IgE, total IgE minus serum specific IgE, symptoms, sex, and age. In phase 3 (N = 70), 97% of cases were accurately predicted as positive and 94% as negative. Our model showed an advantage in clinical prediction compared with serum specific IgE only, skin prick test only, and serum specific IgE and skin prick test (92% accuracy vs 57%, and 81%, respectively).

Conclusion: Our findings have implications for the improved delivery of food allergy–related health care, enhanced food allergy–related quality of life, and economized use of health service resources by decreasing the number of food challenges performed.

Authors : Audrey DunnGalvin, Deirdre Daly, Claire Cullinane, Emily Stenke, Diane Keeton, Mich Erlewyn-Lajeunesse, Graham C. Roberts, Jane Lucas, Jonathan O'B. Hourihane
Read Full Article